| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
1301. A philosophical discussion on speed - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Tzar'rim Edited by: Tzar''rim on 28/07/2008 03:05:21 Any tactic/module that makes most if not all other tactics/modules obsolete or under performing, leaving ships NOT using that tactic/module dead in it's wake needs reb...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2008.07.28 03:07:00
|
1302. A philosophical discussion on speed - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: "Areo Hotah" Edited by: Areo Hotah on 25/07/2008 13:18:08 I am on the receiving end of (AAA) nano-hacs daily. I have had an invasion of the old TRI in my space. Observations from me fighting nano gangs: -nobody takes booste...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2008.07.28 03:00:00
|
1303. A philosophical discussion on speed - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Pattern Clarc on 28/07/2008 03:03:06 5) We need new traps, (ie, micro environment mines anti ecm, anti mwd), more variation in the type of space you would be likely to fight in, and a culture of developing counter's and enriching th...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2008.07.28 02:59:00
|
1304. A philosophical discussion on speed - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
So obviously, i'm a pro-nano supporter? No, not in the least, what I stand for however is the increase of tactical and strategic options, I oppose the culture of habitual nerfing (first nerf ECM, then Nos, then damage, then Damps, then nano's, th...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2008.07.28 02:59:00
|
1305. A philosophical discussion on speed - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Pattern Clarc on 28/07/2008 03:02:09 Question. Should you be able to catch that, which you are unable to trap or unwilling to outmanoeuvre? There's a lot of whining about the perceived notion that going fast in EvE is risk free p...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2008.07.28 02:58:00
|
1306. A philosophical discussion on speed - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Pattern Clarc on 28/07/2008 03:02:54 4) Just like MWD's, webs are the equivalent to the 90% resist invulnerability field, it totally butchers whatever remaining usefulness of speed within the area it can be applied
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2008.07.28 02:58:00
|
1307. [VOTE] All AGAINST The Nano-Nerf - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: AnmmnA I support Nano-nerf lol, posting in the anti nerf thread ftl
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2008.07.26 23:19:00
|
1308. [ISSUE] ECM - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
also... Quote: Assuming ECCM +100% immunity = For the first week, 50%-80% less falcons... For the second week, 60%-30% less people fitting ECCM mods eventually, you'll have an equilibrium of people with ECCM vs jammers, combined with incre...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2008.07.26 23:18:00
|
1309. [ISSUE] ECM - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Edited by: Pattern Clarc on 26/07/2008 23:15:54 k. Assuming you have a falcon with 2, T2 racial jammers, max skills, 2 Signal Distortion amps and 2 Particle Dispersion Augmentors VS None ECCM Hurricane = 98% chance of jamming every cycle Sl...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2008.07.26 23:14:00
|
1310. [issue] Pre-Nerf Speculation should not be [issue]'s - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
I also dissagree and quote jade constantine on this one Originally by: Jade Constantine Originally by: LaVista Vista I agree. This is just silly. I mean, did people even read the very first line of the dev-blog? I'm going to dis...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2008.07.26 23:09:00
|
1311. [VOTE] All AGAINST The Nano-Nerf - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Edited by: Pattern Clarc on 26/07/2008 23:06:30 Some quotes the CCP should take into consideration. Quote: 1) The nerf doesn't fix anything, ships will still be able to go beyond the magic number and receive no damage, it's just a littl...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2008.07.26 23:06:00
|
1312. New Dev Blog: Speed Rebalanced by Nozh - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Some quotes the CCP should take into consideration. Quote: 1) The nerf doesn't fix anything, ships will still be able to go beyond the magic number and receive no damage, it's just a little harder. The mechanics is broken, hit effects and m...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2008.07.26 22:43:00
|
1313. New Dev Blog: Speed Rebalanced by Nozh - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Some quotes the CCP should take into consideration. Quote: 1) The nerf doesn't fix anything, ships will still be able to go beyond the magic number and receive no damage, it's just a little harder. The mechanics is broken, hit effects and m...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2008.07.26 22:35:00
|
1314. Has the CCP lost your respect due to this collosial capitulation? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: OVERCOPES 1 Originally by: Pattern Clarc Originally by: Anubis Xian The speed nerf is needed. If you want to go insanely fast, use a ship intended for it. your completely irrelevant And your a tool thi...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2008.07.25 16:45:00
|
1315. Has the CCP lost your respect due to this collosial capitulation? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Molly Missile Our makeshift player solution to blobbing pretty much broke their physics engine (by CCP's own admission) Why would I lose respect for them fixing that? We or CCP will have to find another way to counter the ...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2008.07.25 16:38:00
|
1316. Has the CCP lost your respect due to this collosial capitulation? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Pattern Clarc on 25/07/2008 16:33:19 Originally by: Tarminic Originally by: Pattern Clarc get the **** out of my thread Okay, now you're just trolling. Look at that guy, hasn't even read the tread, every post ...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2008.07.25 16:33:00
|
1317. Has the CCP lost your respect due to this collosial capitulation? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Anubis Xian Originally by: Pattern Clarc Originally by: Anubis Xian Originally by: Pattern Clarc Originally by: Anubis Xian The speed nerf is needed. If you want to go insanely fast, use a shi...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2008.07.25 16:27:00
|
1318. Has the CCP lost your respect due to this collosial capitulation? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Tarminic Originally by: Pattern Clarc I'm just disappointed in the heavy handed and ill-conceived changes there suggesting and this pattern of capitulating to the lowest common denominator instead of introducing new...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2008.07.25 16:17:00
|
1319. Has the CCP lost your respect due to this collosial capitulation? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Anubis Xian Originally by: Pattern Clarc Originally by: Anubis Xian The speed nerf is needed. If you want to go insanely fast, use a ship intended for it. your completely irrelevant I predate you. yo...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2008.07.25 16:02:00
|
1320. Has the CCP lost your respect due to this collosial capitulation? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Edited by: Pattern Clarc on 25/07/2008 16:02:33 Originally by: SaorAlba Originally by: Pattern Clarc Edited by: Pattern Clarc on 25/07/2008 14:57:16 FW introduces a ton of noobs to PvP Noobs complain about the difficulty o...
- by Pattern Clarc - at 2008.07.25 16:00:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |